Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL210

Portability
61
Imaging
39
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Samsung TL210 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
27
Overall
31

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Samsung TL210
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Also Known as PL150
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL210 Overview

Here is a detailed comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung TL210, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and TL210 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm S9400W was unveiled 4 years later than the TL210 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL210 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm S9400W grades against the TL210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung TL210

 Fujifilm S9400W TL210 
ReleasedJanuary 2014January 2010Fresher by 49 months
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Fujifilm S9400W

 TL210 Fujifilm S9400W 
Screen dimensions3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung TL210

 Fujifilm S9400W TL210 
Manual focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9400W provides outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung TL210 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung TL210 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W vs the TL210.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL210 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9400W and TL210 is 61 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL210 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over specifications. The graphic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9400W and TL210.

Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Fujifilm S9400W to offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9400W provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL210 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Portrait photography with Samsung TL210
36
decent MP (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
20
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Street photography highlights
Samsung TL210 Street photography highlights
41
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competition in class (670 grams)
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus by touch
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than average in class (177g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography features
Samsung TL210 Sports photography features
55
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
good battery power (500 CIPA)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography info
Samsung TL210 Travel photography info
54
good battery power (500 per charge)
decent MP (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (670 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
59
comes with focus by touch
has built in flash
quite wide (27mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (177 grams)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Landscape photography with Samsung TL210
44
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
good battery power (500 per charge)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
36
quite wide (27mm)
screen larger than average (3.5 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging factors
Samsung TL210 Vlogging factors
26
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic socket
heavier than competition in class (670g)
27
quite wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than average in class (177 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL210 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung TL210
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WSamsung TL210
General Information
Company FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Samsung TL210
Also called as - PL150
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Introduced 2014-01-06 2010-01-06
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 27-135mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3.5"
Resolution of display 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 10.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.00 m 3.40 m
Flash settings Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lbs) 177 grams (0.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs -
Battery style AA -
Battery ID 4 x AA SLB-07B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $330 $230