Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB350F
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm S9400W was released around the same time to the WB350F and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm S9400W grades against the WB350F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Samsung WB350F. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm S9400W | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Fujifilm S9400W
| WB350F | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm S9400W | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2014 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9400W features exterior dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W vs the WB350F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and WB350F is 61 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9400W and WB350F.
As you can tell, both cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels and you can expect similar quality of images though you will need to factor the age of the products into consideration.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung WB350F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lb) | 276 grams (0.61 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $330 | $260 |
