Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB700
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched December 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung WB700, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm S9400W was released 3 years after the WB700 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores versus the WB700 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W and Samsung WB700. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery and Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung WB700
| Fujifilm S9400W | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | December 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| WB700 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung WB700
| Fujifilm S9400W | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9400W has got outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung WB700 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W vs the WB700.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9400W and WB700 is 61 and 98 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to see the gap between sensor sizes just by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9400W and WB700.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Fujifilm S9400W to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9400W is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung WB700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Style of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $330 | $300 |