Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Revealed January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm S9400W was announced 13 months after the H200 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores vs the H200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Sony H200
| Fujifilm S9400W | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| H200 | Fujifilm S9400W |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Sony H200
| Fujifilm S9400W | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9400W features outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Sony H200 has dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W compared to the H200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and H200 is 61 and 67 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The pic here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9400W and H200.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Sony H200 to render greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm S9400W provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) | 530 gr (1.17 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | AA | AA |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $330 | $250 |