Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front
Portability
67
Imaging
45
Features
31
Overall
39

Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2014
Sony H200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The Fujifilm S9400W was announced 13 months after the H200 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).

Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores vs the H200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Sony H200

 Fujifilm S9400W H200 
RevealedJanuary 2014January 2013Newer by 13 months

Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Fujifilm S9400W

 H200 Fujifilm S9400W 

Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Sony H200

 Fujifilm S9400W H200 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Display resolution460k460kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9400W features outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Sony H200 has dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).

Examine the Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W compared to the H200.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and H200 is 61 and 67 respectively.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The pic here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9400W and H200.

As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Sony H200 to render greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm S9400W provides a benefit in sensor technology.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography factors
Sony H200 Portrait photography factors
37
decent MP (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
38
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
supports face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Street photography camera
Sony H200 as a Street photography camera
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than competition (670 grams)
45
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competition (530 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography factors
Sony H200 Sports photography factors
55
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (500 CIPA)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
47
excellent zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery (240 shots)
has no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Travel photography with Sony H200
54
better than average battery life (500 per charge)
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (670 grams)
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
53
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great zoom (633mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
bad battery (240 per charge)
more heavy than competition (530 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography info
Sony H200 Landscape photography info
44
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
better than average battery life (500 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
41
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
bad battery (240 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging information
Sony H200 Vlogging information
26
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic port
heavier than competition (670 grams)
25
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone socket
more heavy than competition (530 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Sony H200
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WSony Cyber-shot DSC-H200
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Sony
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2014-01-06 2013-01-08
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 2920
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 24-633mm (26.4x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.1-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 20cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD ClearPhoto LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1700 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 10.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m 6.80 m
Flash options Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 gr (1.48 lbs) 530 gr (1.17 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 240 photographs
Battery type AA AA
Battery model 4 x AA 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Launch cost $330 $250