Fujifilm SL1000 vs Panasonic FZ200
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
61 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
Fujifilm SL1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 659g - 123 x 89 x 123mm
- Announced January 2013
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Replacement is Panasonic FZ300
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm SL1000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Fujifilm SL1000 versus Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm SL1000 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm SL1000 was announced 6 months after the FZ200 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm SL1000 grades vs the FZ200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm SL1000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm SL1000 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL1000 over the Panasonic FZ200
| Fujifilm SL1000 | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Fujifilm SL1000
| FZ200 | Fujifilm SL1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL1000 and Panasonic FZ200
| Fujifilm SL1000 | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | July 2012 | Same generation |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm SL1000 has physical dimensions of 123mm x 89mm x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") accompanied by a weight of 659 grams (1.45 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm SL1000 versus Panasonic FZ200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm SL1000 compared to the FZ200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm SL1000 and FZ200 is 61 and 65 respectively.
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing technical specs. The picture here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm SL1000 and FZ200.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Fujifilm SL1000 to result in more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively.
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Portrait photography advice
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography advice
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
exports RAW files
lack of manual focus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/4,000s)
has face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Street photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography factors
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
very small sensor (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors in class (659 grams)
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
sensor is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition in class (588 grams)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Sports photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography factors
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
good battery power (350 shots)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
better than average battery life (540 per charge)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography highlights
good battery power (350 shots)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (659 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
better than average battery life (540 per charge)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
rather wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (588 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Landscape photography advice
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography advice
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
exports RAW files
good battery power (350 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse recording
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (540 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Vlogging camera
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have external microphone support
more heavy than competitors in class (659g)
rather wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with mic support
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competition in class (588g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2012-07-18 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,312 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 13.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 659g (1.45 pounds) | 588g (1.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 89 x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 540 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $600 | $499 |