Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB2200F
Portability
61 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
61 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
Fujifilm SL1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 659g - 123 x 89 x 123mm
- Released January 2013
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm SL1000 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm SL1000 was released 12 months earlier than the WB2200F and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm SL1000 matches up versus the WB2200F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 and Samsung WB2200F. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm SL1000 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL1000 over the Samsung WB2200F
| Fujifilm SL1000 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Fujifilm SL1000
| WB2200F | Fujifilm SL1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 12 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL1000 and Samsung WB2200F
| Fujifilm SL1000 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm SL1000 provides external dimensions of 123mm x 89mm x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") with a weight of 659 grams (1.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has sizing of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB2200F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm SL1000 compared to the WB2200F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL1000 and WB2200F is 61 and 59 respectively.
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The picture below might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm SL1000 and WB2200F.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP and you should expect comparable quality of photographs though you need to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm SL1000 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB2200F Portrait photography advice
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
exports RAW files
focusing manually not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Street photography advice
Samsung WB2200F Street photography advice
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
small sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than competition in class (659 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than average in class (708 grams)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB2200F Sports photography factors
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
great battery power (350 shots)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Travel photography advice
Samsung WB2200F Travel photography advice
great battery power (350 CIPA)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (659 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (20mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (708g)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB2200F as a Landscape photography camera
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
exports RAW files
great battery power (350 shots)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
small sensor (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse function
focusing manually
quite wide (20mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Vlogging features
Samsung WB2200F Vlogging features
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing mic support
heavier than competition in class (659 grams)
quite wide (20mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone support
more heavy than average in class (708 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920k dots | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 1/8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 659g (1.45 lbs) | 708g (1.56 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 89 x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $600 | $599 |