Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB250F
61 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 659g - 123 x 89 x 123mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Fujifilm SL1000 and Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm SL1000 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm SL1000 was announced around the same time to the WB250F which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm SL1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm SL1000 scores vs the WB250F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 & Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm SL1000 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL1000 over the Samsung WB250F
| Fujifilm SL1000 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Fujifilm SL1000
| WB250F | Fujifilm SL1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL1000 and Samsung WB250F
| Fujifilm SL1000 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm SL1000 offers physical measurements of 123mm x 89mm x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") having a weight of 659 grams (1.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm SL1000 and Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm SL1000 versus the WB250F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm SL1000 and WB250F is 61 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm SL1000 and WB250F.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Fujifilm SL1000 to resolve more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images much more aggressively.
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 | Samsung WB250F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920k dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 659g (1.45 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 89 x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $600 | $250 |