Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sony H400
Portability
61 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
61 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
62 Imaging
44 Features
41 Overall
42
62 Imaging
44 Features
41 Overall
42
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
Fujifilm SL1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 659g - 123 x 89 x 123mm
- Revealed January 2013
Sony H400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Revealed February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sony H400 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sony H400, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm SL1000 (16MP) and the H400 (20MP) is fairly close and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm SL1000 was manufactured 13 months earlier than the H400 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm SL1000 grades vs the H400 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sony H400 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm SL1000 Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL1000 over the Sony H400
| Fujifilm SL1000 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Fujifilm SL1000
| H400 | Fujifilm SL1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 13 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL1000 and Sony H400
| Fujifilm SL1000 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm SL1000 enjoys physical measurements of 123mm x 89mm x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") accompanied by a weight of 659 grams (1.45 lbs) and the Sony H400 has measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") having a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
See the Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sony H400 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm SL1000 compared to the H400.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm SL1000 and H400 is 61 and 62 respectively.
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing specs. The visual here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm SL1000 and H400.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Sony H400 to result in greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm SL1000 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Portrait photography advice
Sony H400 Portrait photography advice
good megapixels (16MP)
delivers RAW formats
manual focus not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
megapixel count good (20MP)
includes face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Street photography features
Sony H400 Street photography features
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
heavier than average in class (659g)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than average (628 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Sports photography highlights
Sony H400 Sports photography highlights
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
better than average battery life (350 CIPA)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
long zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
max fps low (1.0 frames/s)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 as a Travel photography camera
Sony H400 as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery life (350 per charge)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (659 grams)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
long zoom (1550mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than average (628g)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Fujifilm SL1000
Landscape photography with Sony H400
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (350 CIPA)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse recording
relatively wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 Vlogging highlights
Sony H400 Vlogging highlights
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not have selfie friendly display
no external mic port
heavier than average in class (659g)
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
does have external microphone socket
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
more heavy than average (628 grams)
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dots | 201 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.80 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 X 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 659 grams (1.45 lbs) | 628 grams (1.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 89 x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $600 | $268 |