Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
![Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-SL240/Fujifilm-SL240-front.jpg)
![Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-800-UZ/Olympus-SP-800-UZ-front.jpg)
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is fairly similar and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm SL240 was announced 24 months after the SP-800 UZ making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm SL240 grades vs the SP-800 UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix SL240 & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm SL240 Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Fujifilm SL240 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 24 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm SL240
SP-800 UZ | Fujifilm SL240 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
Fujifilm SL240 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm SL240 has exterior dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 against the SP-800 UZ.
![Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-SL240-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL240 and SP-800 UZ is 67 and 69 respectively.
![Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-SL240-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm SL240 and SP-800 UZ.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution and you can expect similar quality of images but you will want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The younger Fujifilm SL240 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
![Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-SL240-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-SL240-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 12 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 510 gr (1.12 lb) | 455 gr (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-85 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $280 | $270 |