Clicky

Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
67
Imaging
38
Features
39
Overall
38
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm SL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Updated by Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

In this write-up, we are evaluating the Fujifilm SL240 versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very similar and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm SL240 was revealed 6 months later than the VR-320 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the Fujifilm SL240 grades against the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm SL240 VR-320 
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm SL240

 VR-320 Fujifilm SL240 

Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm SL240 VR-320 
RevealedJanuary 2012July 2011Similar generation
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm SL240 provides external dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm SL240 versus Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 against the VR-320.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm SL240 and VR-320 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm SL240 and VR-320.

Clearly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact MP and you should expect similar quality of files although you may want to consider the release date of the products into consideration.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm SL240
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
38
megapixel count good (14MP)
provides face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
33
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
provides face detect focusing
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm SL240
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than average (510 grams)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
47
long zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
54
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (576mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (510g)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
70
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
no Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm SL240
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
41
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
42
really wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Vlogging highlights
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging highlights
24
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic socket
heavier than average (510 grams)
32
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic support
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm SL240 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm SL240 and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm FinePix SL240Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix SL240 Olympus VR-320
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2012-01-05 2011-07-19
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Max enhanced ISO 6400 -
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-576mm (24.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 2cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 510 gr (1.12 lbs) 158 gr (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-85 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $280 $179