Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh PX
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Fujifilm SL240 and Ricoh PX, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and the PX (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm SL240 was brought out 5 months later than the PX which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm SL240 grades vs the PX with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix SL240 and Ricoh PX. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm SL240 Gallery and Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Ricoh PX
| Fujifilm SL240 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Fujifilm SL240
| PX | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Ricoh PX
| Fujifilm SL240 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | August 2011 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm SL240 features exterior measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") with a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Ricoh PX has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm SL240 and Ricoh PX in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 vs the PX.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm SL240 and PX is 67 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm SL240 and PX.
To sum up, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh PX to offer you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Ricoh PX |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 510g (1.12 pounds) | 156g (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-85 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $280 | $329 |