Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh WG-70
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- New Model is Ricoh WG-80
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh WG-70, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm SL240 was revealed 9 years before the WG-70 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm SL240 scores versus the WG-70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix SL240 and Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm SL240 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Ricoh WG-70
| Fujifilm SL240 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Fujifilm SL240
| WG-70 | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 98 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Ricoh WG-70
| Fujifilm SL240 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm SL240 enjoys external measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") with a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 compared to the WG-70.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm SL240 and WG-70 is 67 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm SL240 and WG-70.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to produce more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm SL240 will be behind in sensor tech.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-05 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 510g (1.12 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-85 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $280 |