Clicky

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung CL5

Portability
67
Imaging
37
Features
39
Overall
37
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front
 
Samsung CL5 front
Portability
95
Imaging
31
Features
14
Overall
24

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs

Fujifilm SL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Samsung CL5
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
  • 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Also referred to as PL10
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung CL5 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm SL240 and Samsung CL5, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the Fujifilm SL240 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") offer different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm SL240 was introduced 2 years after the CL5 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the Fujifilm SL240 scores versus the CL5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Samsung CL5

 Fujifilm SL240 CL5 
LaunchedJanuary 2012February 2009Newer by 35 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Fujifilm SL240

 CL5 Fujifilm SL240 

Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Samsung CL5

 Fujifilm SL240 CL5 
Manually focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm SL240 offers exterior dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") with a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL5 has dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm SL240 and Samsung CL5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 vs the CL5.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung CL5 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL240 and CL5 is 67 and 95 respectively.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The image here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm SL240 and CL5.

As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm SL240 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm SL240 will provide extra detail using its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm SL240 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung CL5 Portrait photography highlights
38
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
24
comes with face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm SL240
Street photography with Samsung CL5
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than others (510g)
47
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Sports photography features
Samsung CL5 Sports photography features
47
excellent zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes tracking autofocus
max frames per second very slow (1.0 frames per second)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
15
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
has no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm SL240
Travel photography with Samsung CL5
54
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (576mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (510 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.1)
50
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung CL5 Landscape photography highlights
41
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
21
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Vlogging info
Samsung CL5 Vlogging info
24
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic socket
heavier than others (510g)
24
comes with face detection focusing
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone support
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm SL240 and Samsung CL5
 Fujifilm FinePix SL240Samsung CL5
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm FinePix SL240 Samsung CL5
Otherwise known as - PL10
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Revealed 2012-01-05 2009-02-23
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 6400 -
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-576mm (24.0x) 38-114mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/3.5-4.5
Macro focusing distance 2cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 6.3
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 16s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 510 grams (1.12 pounds) 141 grams (0.31 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-85 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $280 $391