Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91294/91294afcddfb537e41c3a35a65fed92124da3a89" alt="Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea7e4/ea7e4ee78f1fa0fb4022ac36c31077cfef4a19c1" alt="Samsung SL102 front Samsung SL102 front"
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Fujifilm SL240 versus Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The Fujifilm SL240 was manufactured 3 years after the SL102 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm SL240 grades versus the SL102 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix SL240 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm SL240 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Samsung SL102
Fujifilm SL240 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm SL240
SL102 | Fujifilm SL240 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Samsung SL102
Fujifilm SL240 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm SL240 comes with exterior measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") along with a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm SL240 versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 and the SL102.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e80a/3e80a8491fe0a50103aa2d63b75301ef2425e9c9" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL240 and SL102 is 67 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43ad4/43ad4dc5ebad7c96782fa9428cb35f6110a7df22" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm SL240 and SL102.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Fujifilm SL240 to render extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm SL240 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45d2e/45d2e4a34247f61ee008133c00fa1a80887e74d5" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f983d/f983d825ce82f8affc959f53d67be79751c016df" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Samsung SL102 |
Also called as | - | ES55 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 510 gr (1.12 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-85 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $280 | $130 |