Clicky

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102

Portability
67
Imaging
37
Features
39
Overall
37
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Fujifilm SL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
  • Launched January 2012
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
  • Alternative Name is ES55
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Overview

The following is a in-depth analysis of the Fujifilm SL240 versus Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm SL240 was manufactured 3 years after the SL102 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm SL240 grades versus the SL102 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Samsung SL102

 Fujifilm SL240 SL102 
ReleasedJanuary 2012January 2009Newer by 37 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm SL240

 SL102 Fujifilm SL240 

Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Samsung SL102

 Fujifilm SL240 SL102 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm SL240 comes with exterior measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") along with a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm SL240 versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 and the SL102.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL240 and SL102 is 67 and 96 respectively.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm SL240 and SL102.

As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Fujifilm SL240 to render extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm SL240 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Portrait photography advice
Samsung SL102 Portrait photography advice
38
MP count good (14 megapixels)
features face detection focus
no manual focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
25
offers face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm SL240
Street photography with Samsung SL102
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than average in class (510g)
55
lighter than competition in class (116g)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
47
great zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Travel photography details
Samsung SL102 Travel photography details
54
MP count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (576mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (510 grams)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
62
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
built-in flash
very good max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse function
low MP (10MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (35mm)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm SL240
Landscape photography with Samsung SL102
41
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Timelapse recording
27
very good max aperture (f)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
tiny screen (2.5")
no manual control
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung SL102 as a Vlogging camera
24
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone jack
more heavy than average in class (510 grams)
30
very good max aperture (f)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (116g)
wide angle not great (35mm)
does not contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic port
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm SL240 and Samsung SL102
 Fujifilm FinePix SL240Samsung SL102
General Information
Make FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix SL240 Samsung SL102
Also called as - ES55
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-01-05 2009-01-08
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 6400 -
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-576mm (24.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 2cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.5 inches
Resolution of display 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 510 gr (1.12 lbs) 116 gr (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-85 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $280 $130