Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91294/91294afcddfb537e41c3a35a65fed92124da3a89" alt="Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2103a/2103adbddc269259d95545a9af4d247992bac1f0" alt="Samsung TL350 front Samsung TL350 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Also referred to as WB2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Fujifilm SL240 versus Samsung TL350, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The Fujifilm SL240 was revealed 23 months after the TL350 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm SL240 matches up vs the TL350 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix SL240 and Samsung TL350. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm SL240 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Samsung TL350
Fujifilm SL240 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Fujifilm SL240
TL350 | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Samsung TL350
Fujifilm SL240 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm SL240 enjoys outside measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") and a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm SL240 versus Samsung TL350 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 vs the TL350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042e3/042e3e52fcf3ac823d7e7ff49dd567b87c2a6ef7" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm SL240 and TL350 is 67 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0f38/d0f38cdf3600282ced456fccb4e7ed26df33a3fa" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The picture below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm SL240 and TL350.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Fujifilm SL240 to produce more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm SL240 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e068/3e068edabb455d411f45ed5898764be49b728a61" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0a95/a0a95af34065fb67f738d13df674a198a3417e16" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Samsung TL350 |
Also Known as | - | WB2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 510 gr (1.12 lb) | 195 gr (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-85 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $280 | $400 |