Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB350F
67 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Fujifilm SL240 versus Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm SL240 was launched 24 months before the WB350F which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm SL240 grades vs the WB350F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix SL240 & Samsung WB350F. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm SL240 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm SL240 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Fujifilm SL240
| WB350F | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm SL240 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm SL240 has got physical dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm SL240 versus Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 compared to the WB350F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL240 and WB350F is 67 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The visual below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm SL240 and WB350F.
All in all, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB350F to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm SL240 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 510g (1.12 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-85 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $280 | $260 |
