Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB700
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched December 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Fujifilm SL240 and Samsung WB700, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm SL240 was revealed 13 months after the WB700 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm SL240 scores against the WB700 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix SL240 & Samsung WB700. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm SL240 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Samsung WB700
| Fujifilm SL240 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | December 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Fujifilm SL240
| WB700 | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Samsung WB700
| Fujifilm SL240 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm SL240 has outside measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm SL240 and Samsung WB700 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 versus the WB700.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL240 and WB700 is 67 and 98 respectively.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm SL240 and WB700.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you should really take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent Fujifilm SL240 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm SL240 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Samsung WB700 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-01-05 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 510 gr (1.12 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-85 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $280 | $300 |