Clicky

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
67
Imaging
37
Features
39
Overall
37
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Fujifilm SL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Let's look more closely at the Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the Fujifilm SL240 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) posses different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The Fujifilm SL240 was introduced 3 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm SL240 grades against the DP2 Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 Fujifilm SL240 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Fujifilm SL240

 DP2 Quattro Fujifilm SL240 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014January 2012Newer by 25 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display resolution920k460kClearer display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 Fujifilm SL240 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display size
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm SL240 has got outside measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 against the DP2 Quattro.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm SL240 and DP2 Quattro is 67 and 70 respectively.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm SL240 and DP2 Quattro.

To sum up, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm SL240 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer you more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm SL240 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Portrait photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography info
38
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
features face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
77
has manual focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has face detect focus
saves RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Street photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography advice
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than others (510g)
61
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
47
incredible zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
features tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
47
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
54
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
very long reach (576mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than others (510g)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
53
MP count decent (20MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Landscape photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography advice
41
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
59
has manual focus
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm SL240
Vlogging with Sigma DP2 Quattro
24
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
more heavy than others (510 grams)
9
lack of video recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm SL240 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Fujifilm FinePix SL240Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Sigma
Model Fujifilm FinePix SL240 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2012-01-05 2014-02-13
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 6400 -
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-576mm (24.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focus range 2cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 510g (1.12 pounds) 395g (0.87 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-85 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $280 $931