Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37


70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's look more closely at the Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the Fujifilm SL240 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) posses different sensor size.

The Fujifilm SL240 was introduced 3 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm SL240 grades against the DP2 Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix SL240 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm SL240 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
Fujifilm SL240 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Fujifilm SL240
DP2 Quattro | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 25 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
Fujifilm SL240 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm SL240 has got outside measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 against the DP2 Quattro.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm SL240 and DP2 Quattro is 67 and 70 respectively.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm SL240 and DP2 Quattro.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm SL240 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer you more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm SL240 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 510g (1.12 pounds) | 395g (0.87 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-85 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $280 | $931 |