Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus SP-100
Portability
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
Portability
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus SP-100 Key Specs
Fujifilm SL300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2012
Olympus SP-100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Revealed January 2014
Photography Glossary Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus SP-100 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus SP-100, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm SL300 (14MP) and the SP-100 (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm SL300 was launched 3 years earlier than the SP-100 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm SL300 grades versus the SP-100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus SP-100 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix SL300 & Olympus Stylus SP-100. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm SL300 Gallery & Olympus SP-100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL300 over the Olympus SP-100
| Fujifilm SL300 | SP-100 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Fujifilm SL300
| SP-100 | Fujifilm SL300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 25 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL300 and Olympus SP-100
| Fujifilm SL300 | SP-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus SP-100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm SL300 enjoys physical dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Olympus SP-100 has measurements of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") having a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus SP-100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm SL300 vs the SP-100.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL300 and SP-100 is 67 and 63 respectively.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus SP-100 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The graphic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm SL300 and SP-100.
All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus SP-100 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older Fujifilm SL300 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus SP-100 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm SL300 Portrait photography factors
Olympus SP-100 Portrait photography factors
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports face detect focusing
no manual focus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
supports face detection autofocus
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Fujifilm SL300 as a Street photography camera
Olympus SP-100 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competition in class (510 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than competition in class (594 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm SL300
Sports photography with Olympus SP-100
long zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Fujifilm SL300 Travel photography features
Olympus SP-100 Travel photography features
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (720mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (510g)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (594 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm SL300 Landscape photography info
Olympus SP-100 Landscape photography info
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm SL300
Vlogging with Olympus SP-100
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic support
heavier than competition in class (510 grams)
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has external mic support
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
heavier than competition in class (594 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus SP-100 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Olympus Stylus SP-100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-01-05 | 2014-01-29 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 920k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Optional |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 510 grams (1.12 lbs) | 594 grams (1.31 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 330 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-85 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $280 | $400 |