Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh CX2
67 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm SL300 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm SL300 was revealed 2 years later than the CX2 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm SL300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm SL300 scores versus the CX2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix SL300 and Ricoh CX2. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm SL300 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL300 over the Ricoh CX2
| Fujifilm SL300 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 29 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Fujifilm SL300
| CX2 | Fujifilm SL300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL300 and Ricoh CX2
| Fujifilm SL300 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm SL300 has outer measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh CX2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm SL300 versus the CX2.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL300 and CX2 is 67 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm SL300 and CX2.
As you can see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Fujifilm SL300 to produce greater detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm SL300 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 510 gr (1.12 pounds) | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-85 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $280 | $341 |