Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh WG-M1
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm SL300 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm SL300 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very similar and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm SL300 was announced 3 years before the WG-M1 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm SL300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm SL300 matches up versus the WG-M1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix SL300 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm SL300 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL300 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm SL300 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+345k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm SL300
| WG-M1 | Fujifilm SL300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 32 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL300 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm SL300 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm SL300 has outer dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") with a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm SL300 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm SL300 versus the WG-M1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL300 and WG-M1 is 67 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm SL300 and WG-M1.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution and you can expect similar quality of images but you should really factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The older Fujifilm SL300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm SL300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 510g (1.12 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 350 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-85 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $280 | $2,000 |