Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung SL102
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Fujifilm SL300 versus Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm SL300 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm SL300 was launched 3 years after the SL102 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm SL300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm SL300 matches up against the SL102 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix SL300 & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm SL300 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL300 over the Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm SL300 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm SL300
| SL102 | Fujifilm SL300 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm SL300 and Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm SL300 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm SL300 provides exterior dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") and a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm SL300 versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm SL300 against the SL102.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL300 and SL102 is 67 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The picture below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm SL300 and SL102.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Fujifilm SL300 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm SL300 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 510 grams (1.12 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-85 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $280 | $130 |