Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung ST95
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung ST95, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm SL300 (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is pretty similar and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm SL300 was introduced 12 months after the ST95 and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm SL300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm SL300 grades versus the ST95 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix SL300 and Samsung ST95. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm SL300 Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL300 over the Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm SL300 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Fujifilm SL300
| ST95 | Fujifilm SL300 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm SL300 and Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm SL300 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm SL300 features outside dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") along with a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung ST95 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm SL300 vs the ST95.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm SL300 and ST95 is 67 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The picture here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm SL300 and ST95.
As you have seen, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung ST95 to offer extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm SL300 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Samsung ST95 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 510g (1.12 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-85 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $145 |