Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
![Fujifilm FinePix SL300 front Fujifilm FinePix SL300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-SL300/Fujifilm-SL300-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB210 front Samsung WB210 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB210/Samsung-WB210-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Fujifilm SL300 versus Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm SL300 (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm SL300 was brought out 6 months after the WB210 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm SL300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm SL300 matches up versus the WB210 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix SL300 & Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm SL300 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL300 over the Samsung WB210
Fujifilm SL300 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 1k | Sharper display (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Fujifilm SL300
WB210 | Fujifilm SL300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL300 and Samsung WB210
Fujifilm SL300 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | Same age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm SL300 has got external measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") and a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm SL300 versus Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm SL300 vs the WB210.
![Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 size comparison Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-SL300-vs-Samsung-WB210-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL300 and WB210 is 67 and 94 respectively.
![Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-SL300-vs-Samsung-WB210-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The image below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm SL300 and WB210.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical MP and you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you would want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
![Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-SL300-vs-Samsung-WB210-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-SL300-vs-Samsung-WB210-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Samsung WB210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Samsung WB210 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 1k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 510g (1.12 lb) | 174g (0.38 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-85 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $280 | $279 |