Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB250F
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Fujifilm SL300 and Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm SL300 (14MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm SL300 was brought out 12 months earlier than the WB250F which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm SL300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm SL300 scores versus the WB250F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix SL300 & Samsung WB250F. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm SL300 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL300 over the Samsung WB250F
| Fujifilm SL300 | WB250F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Fujifilm SL300
| WB250F | Fujifilm SL300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | January 2012 | More recent by 12 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL300 and Samsung WB250F
| Fujifilm SL300 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm SL300 provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm SL300 and Samsung WB250F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm SL300 and the WB250F.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm SL300 and WB250F is 67 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm SL300 and WB250F.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP therefore you can expect similar quality of images however you really should factor the age of the products into consideration. The older Fujifilm SL300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm SL300 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 510g (1.12 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-85 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $280 | $250 |