Fujifilm SL300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
67 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Fujifilm SL300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014
Fujifilm SL300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Fujifilm SL300 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm SL300 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the Fujifilm SL300 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm SL300 was launched 3 years before the DP2 Quattro which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm SL300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm SL300 grades vs the DP2 Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix SL300 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm SL300 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL300 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
Fujifilm SL300 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Fujifilm SL300
DP2 Quattro | Fujifilm SL300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | January 2012 | Newer by 25 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
Fujifilm SL300 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm SL300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm SL300 has outside dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm SL300 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm SL300 compared to the DP2 Quattro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm SL300 and DP2 Quattro is 67 and 70 respectively.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing technical specs. The pic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm SL300 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can tell, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm SL300 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm SL300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm SL300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 510 gr (1.12 lb) | 395 gr (0.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-85 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $280 | $931 |