Fujifilm SL300 vs Sony H200
Portability
67 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
67 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
Portability
67 Imaging
45 Features
31 Overall
39
67 Imaging
45 Features
31 Overall
39
Fujifilm SL300 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
Fujifilm SL300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Launched January 2012
Sony H200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Released January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm SL300 vs Sony H200 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Fujifilm SL300 vs Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm SL300 (14MP) and H200 (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm SL300 was revealed 12 months before the H200 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the Fujifilm SL300 matches up against the H200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm SL300 vs Sony H200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix SL300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm SL300 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL300 over the Sony H200
| Fujifilm SL300 | H200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Fujifilm SL300
| H200 | Fujifilm SL300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 12 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL300 and Sony H200
| Fujifilm SL300 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Fujifilm SL300 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm SL300 comes with exterior dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has specifications of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm SL300 vs Sony H200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm SL300 compared to the H200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL300 and H200 is 67 and 67 respectively.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm SL300 and H200.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Sony H200 to deliver greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm SL300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm SL300 Portrait photography features
Sony H200 Portrait photography features
megapixel count decent (14MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Fujifilm SL300 Street photography details
Sony H200 Street photography details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than competition (510 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (530 grams)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Fujifilm SL300 as a Sports photography camera
Sony H200 as a Sports photography camera
excellent zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
long zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (240 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Fujifilm SL300 Travel photography factors
Sony H200 Travel photography factors
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
very long zoom (720mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (510g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
megapixel count good (20MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
very long reach (633mm)
no Time Lapse function
terrible battery life (240 shots)
heavier than competitors in class (530 grams)
does not have selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Fujifilm SL300
Landscape photography with Sony H200
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Timelapse mode
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
terrible battery life (240 shots)
no Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm SL300
Vlogging with Sony H200
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone port
more heavy than competition (510 grams)
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
does not have selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic port
heavier than competitors in class (530g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm SL300 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 510g (1.12 lb) | 530g (1.17 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 240 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | NP-85 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $280 | $250 |
