Fujifilm T400 vs Kodak Sport
93 Imaging
38 Features
28 Overall
34
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Fujifilm T400 vs Kodak Sport Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm T400 vs Kodak Sport Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Fujifilm T400 vs Kodak Sport, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and Sport (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm T400 was released 13 months after the Sport which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the Fujifilm T400 grades against the Sport with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm T400 vs Kodak Sport Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix T400 & Kodak EasyShare Sport. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm T400 Gallery & Kodak Sport Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Kodak Sport
| Fujifilm T400 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 | January 2011 | More modern by 13 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 112k | Clearer screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Fujifilm T400
| Sport | Fujifilm T400 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Kodak Sport
| Fujifilm T400 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Fujifilm T400 vs Kodak Sport Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm T400 offers outer dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Kodak Sport has dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm T400 vs Kodak Sport in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm T400 versus the Sport.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm T400 and Sport is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Kodak Sport Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by going through specifications. The picture below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm T400 and Sport.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Fujifilm T400 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm T400 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Fujifilm T400 vs Kodak Sport Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm T400 vs Kodak Sport Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Kodak EasyShare Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1250 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.4 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.50 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $150 | $155 |