Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus 9000
93 Imaging
38 Features
28 Overall
34
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm T400 was unveiled 2 years later than the 9000 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm T400 matches up against the 9000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix T400 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm T400 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Olympus 9000
| Fujifilm T400 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 33 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Fujifilm T400
| 9000 | Fujifilm T400 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Olympus 9000
| Fujifilm T400 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm T400 offers exterior dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm T400 compared to the 9000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm T400 and 9000 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out specifications. The photograph here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm T400 and 9000.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Fujifilm T400 to produce extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm T400 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju 9000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC / SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $150 | $300 |