Clicky

Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
93 Imaging
38 Features
28 Overall
34
Fujifilm FinePix T400 front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm T400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
  • 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
  • Released January 2012
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Fujifilm T400 versus Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is pretty similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Fujifilm T400 was launched within a month of the TG-320 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm T400 grades vs the TG-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 Fujifilm T400 TG-320 
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Fujifilm T400

          

          

            
 TG-320 Fujifilm T400 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 Fujifilm T400 TG-320 
ReleasedJanuary 2012January 2012Similar age
Focus manually  Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen measurement
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen  Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither provides Touch screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm T400 provides exterior dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Fujifilm T400 versus Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm T400 and the TG-320.
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm T400 and TG-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
More often than not, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading technical specs. The image here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm T400 and TG-320.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Fujifilm T400 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively.

            Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm T400 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography highlights
34
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 offers face detect focus
 lack of manual focus
 lack of manual exposure
 external flash not possible
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
33
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 includes face detect focusing
 manual focus not available
 no manual mode
 can't use external flash
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Street Comparison
Fujifilm T400 Street photography details
Olympus TG-320 Street photography details
56
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no articulating screen
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
66
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proofing
 lighter than others in class (155g)
 screen is fixed
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sports Comparison
Fujifilm T400 Sports photography details
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography details
37
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 offers tracking focus
 painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
 no shutter priority mode
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 terrible battery power (180 per charge)
 has no phase detect auto focus
40
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 includes tracking focus
 weather proofing
 low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
 no shutter priority mode
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 bad battery power (150 per charge)
 no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm T400 Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography highlights
64
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 flash built-in
 really wide (28mm)
 great reach (280mm)
 doesn't have Timelapse recording
 terrible battery power (180 shots)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.4)
67
 lighter than others in class (155 grams)
 weather proofing
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 has built in flash
 really wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
 bad battery power (150 CIPA)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm T400 Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography advice
37
 really wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 lack of manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.4)
 tiny screen (2.7")
 lack of manual exposure
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
 terrible battery power (180 shots)
 doesn't have Timelapse recording
39
 really wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 weather proofing
 manual focus not available
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is small (2.7")
 no manual mode
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
 bad battery power (150 CIPA)
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm T400
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
30
 really wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers face detect focus
 slow max aperture (f3.4)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
 doesn't have microphone port
32
 really wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 includes face detect focusing
 lighter than others in class (155g)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
 doesn't have mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
        
                
        

          

            
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm T400 and Olympus TG-320
 Fujifilm FinePix T400Olympus TG-320
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix T400 Olympus TG-320
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Released 2012-01-05 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3440 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Max boosted ISO 3200 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch to focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.4-5.6 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing range 5cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch function    
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m 5.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 159 grams (0.35 lb) 155 grams (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 photos 150 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-45A LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting    
Storage type SD / SDHC / SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $150 $0