Clicky

Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-4

Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
Fujifilm FinePix T400 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44

Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

Fujifilm T400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
  • 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched January 2012
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Revealed April 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus TG-3
  • Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview

Following is a comprehensive review of the Fujifilm T400 versus Olympus TG-4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm T400 was introduced 4 years before the TG-4 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm T400 matches up versus the TG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 

				

					

						
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Olympus TG-4

					

					

						
 Fujifilm T400 TG-4 
					

				


				

					

						
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Fujifilm T400

					

					

						
 TG-4 Fujifilm T400 
RevealedApril 2015January 2012More modern by 39 months
Manual focus  More accurate focus
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
					

				


				

					

						
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Olympus TG-4

					

					

						
 Fujifilm T400 TG-4 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Lacking Touch friendly screen
					

				

				

	
	
	
	

				

					

						
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison

					

					

						
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm T400 provides physical measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm T400 versus Olympus TG-4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm T400 versus the TG-4.
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm T400 and TG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison					

				


				

					

						
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison

					

					

						
Generally, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm T400 and TG-4.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures but you might want to take the launch date  of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm T400 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

						Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison
					

				


				

					

						
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

					

					

											

					Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison				


								President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban				

	
	
	
	

				

					
Photography Type Scores

					

				

				
Portrait Comparison
 Fujifilm T400 as a Portrait photography camera
 Olympus TG-4 as a Portrait photography camera
34
 MP count good (16MP)
 supports face detection focusing
 focusing manually not possible
 manual mode not available
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
46
 has manual focus
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 features face detection focusing
 supports RAW formats
 manual mode not possible
 cannot use external flash
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Street Comparison
Street photography with Fujifilm T400
Street photography with Olympus TG-4
57
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports RAW formats
 weather sealing
 no articulating screen
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 more heavy than competitors in class (247 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sports Comparison
Fujifilm T400 Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography factors
38
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 supports tracking autofocus
 max fps very slow (1.0 frames/s)
 no shutter priority mode
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 not so great battery power (180 per charge)
 no phase detect AF
47
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 features tracking autofocus
 weather sealing
 great battery pack (380 CIPA)
 max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames per second)
 no shutter priority mode
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm T400 Travel photography details
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography details
65
 MP count good (16MP)
 has built in flash
 quite wide (28mm)
 very long reach (280mm)
 no Timelapse recording
 not so great battery power (180 CIPA)
 display is not selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
74
 great battery pack (380 CIPA)
 weather sealing
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 good max aperture (f2.0)
 more heavy than competitors in class (247 grams)
 does not feature selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm T400 Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography details
37
 quite wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count good (16MP)
 focusing manually not possible
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
 small screen (2.7 inches)
 manual mode not available
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
 not so great battery power (180 per charge)
 no Timelapse recording
62
 has manual focus
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 good max aperture (f2.0)
 pretty good screen size (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 supports RAW formats
 weather sealing
 great battery pack (380 shots)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 manual mode not possible
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm T400 Vlogging info
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging info
31
 quite wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detection focusing
 slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
 display is not selfie friendly
 low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
 no external microphone port
34
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 good max aperture (f2.0)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 features face detection focusing
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 does not feature selfie friendly screen
 missing external microphone jack
 more heavy than competitors in class (247g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
				
								
				

					

						
Fujifilm T400 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications

					

					

											


					

						Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm T400 and Olympus TG-4
 Fujifilm FinePix T400Olympus Tough TG-4
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix T400 Olympus Tough TG-4
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2012-01-05 2015-04-13
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3440 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Max enhanced ISO 3200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.4-5.6 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m 7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 159 grams (0.35 lb) 247 grams (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 shots 380 shots
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-45A LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD / SDHC / SDXC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $150 $379