Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh CX4
93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm T400 and Ricoh CX4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm T400 was manufactured 17 months after the CX4 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm T400 grades against the CX4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix T400 & Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm T400 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Ricoh CX4
| Fujifilm T400 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Fujifilm T400
| CX4 | Fujifilm T400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Ricoh CX4
| Fujifilm T400 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm T400 provides exterior dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm T400 and Ricoh CX4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm T400 and the CX4.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm T400 and CX4 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The image below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm T400 and CX4.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Fujifilm T400 to result in more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm T400 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 lbs) | 205g (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $150 | $211 |