Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm T400 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the Fujifilm T400 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm T400 was revealed 4 months later than the GR Digital IV which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the Fujifilm T400 grades versus the GR Digital IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix T400 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm T400 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm T400 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Fujifilm T400
GR Digital IV | Fujifilm T400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm T400 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | September 2011 | Similar generation | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm T400 enjoys exterior measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Fujifilm T400 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm T400 versus the GR Digital IV.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm T400 and GR Digital IV is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm T400 and GR Digital IV.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm T400 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF harder and the Fujifilm T400 will give greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-01-05 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 photos | 390 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-45A | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $150 | $599 |