Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4
93 Imaging
38 Features
28 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Fujifilm T400 versus Ricoh WG-4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm T400 was revealed 3 years prior to the WG-4 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm T400 grades against the WG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix T400 and Ricoh WG-4. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm T400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Ricoh WG-4
| Fujifilm T400 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Fujifilm T400
| WG-4 | Fujifilm T400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 25 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Ricoh WG-4
| Fujifilm T400 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm T400 enjoys physical measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm T400 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm T400 compared to the WG-4.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm T400 and WG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The image here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm T400 and WG-4.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of files although you might want to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm T400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-05 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.50 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $150 | $330 |