Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below, we are looking at the Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm T400 was released 3 years before the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm T400 grades vs the WG-4 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix T400 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm T400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Fujifilm T400 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Fujifilm T400
| WG-4 GPS | Fujifilm T400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 25 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Fujifilm T400 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm T400 features external dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm T400 versus the WG-4 GPS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm T400 and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by researching specifications. The picture underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm T400 and WG-4 GPS.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of photos though you might want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm T400 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.50 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 240 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $150 | $210 |