Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-80
93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Fujifilm T400 and Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm T400 was released 11 years earlier than the WG-80 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm T400 matches up against the WG-80 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix T400 & Ricoh WG-80. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm T400 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Ricoh WG-80
| Fujifilm T400 | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Fujifilm T400
| WG-80 | Fujifilm T400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 126 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Ricoh WG-80
| Fujifilm T400 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.70" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm T400 offers exterior measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-80 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Fujifilm T400 and Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm T400 versus the WG-80.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm T400 and WG-80 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The pic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm T400 and WG-80.
Clearly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of files though you will want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm T400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.70" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.50 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 300 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC / SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $150 | $300 |