Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-M1
93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Photography Glossary Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Fujifilm T400 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm T400 was brought out 3 years before the WG-M1 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm T400 scores against the WG-M1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix T400 and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm T400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm T400 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm T400
| WG-M1 | Fujifilm T400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 32 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm T400 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm T400 has outside dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm T400 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm T400 and the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm T400 and WG-M1 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by looking at specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm T400 and WG-M1.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Fujifilm T400 to resolve extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older Fujifilm T400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Fujifilm T400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC / SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $150 | $2,000 |
