Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL820
93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally Known as IT100
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL820, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and SL820 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm T400 was introduced 2 years later than the SL820 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm T400 scores vs the SL820 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix T400 & Samsung SL820. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm T400 Gallery & Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Samsung SL820
| Fujifilm T400 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Fujifilm T400
| SL820 | Fujifilm T400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Samsung SL820
| Fujifilm T400 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm T400 has got exterior measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung SL820 has specifications of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL820 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm T400 and the SL820.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm T400 and SL820 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm T400 and SL820.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Fujifilm T400 to provide more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm T400 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Samsung SL820 |
| Also Known as | - | IT100 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.50 m | 4.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $150 | $280 |