Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500
93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f58d2/f58d269f9557c8ac8dbe36a79fc777c525fa92e3" alt="Fujifilm FinePix T400 front Fujifilm FinePix T400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3208c/3208cbdbdd11e23eae5a341ac80491dad70aec44" alt="Samsung TL500 front Samsung TL500 front"
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Announced July 2010
- Additionally Known as EX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Fujifilm T400 and Samsung TL500, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the Fujifilm T400 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The Fujifilm T400 was introduced 19 months later than the TL500 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm T400 scores versus the TL500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix T400 and Samsung TL500. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm T400 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Samsung TL500
Fujifilm T400 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Fujifilm T400
TL500 | Fujifilm T400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Samsung TL500
Fujifilm T400 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm T400 provides exterior dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has specifications of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm T400 and Samsung TL500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm T400 against the TL500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b117/1b1172f60a3a861f44a17bb5f450f2f5d287c807" alt="Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 size comparison Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm T400 and TL500 is 93 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ec93/4ec937680223c77f5c396b0b0577f523a1726ff6" alt="Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The graphic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm T400 and TL500.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm T400 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Fujifilm T400 will show greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm T400 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef2ad/ef2ad522c67802cec5c206053daf7e335883db48" alt="Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30fce/30fceb6ed409df81370f42adf0784c69eda480c1" alt="Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Samsung TL500 |
Also called | - | EX1 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-01-05 | 2010-07-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) | 386 grams (0.85 lbs) |
Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-45A | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $150 | $527 |