Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB250F
93 Imaging
38 Features
28 Overall
34
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Let's look much closer at the Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB250F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm T400 was unveiled 12 months prior to the WB250F and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm T400 grades against the WB250F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix T400 and Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm T400 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Samsung WB250F
| Fujifilm T400 | WB250F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Fujifilm T400
| WB250F | Fujifilm T400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | January 2012 | Newer by 12 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Samsung WB250F
| Fujifilm T400 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm T400 features outer measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB250F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm T400 versus the WB250F.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm T400 and WB250F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The image below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm T400 and WB250F.
All in all, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Fujifilm T400 to offer more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm T400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $150 | $250 |