Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB50F
93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
92 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Announced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB50F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm T400 was brought out 24 months prior to the WB50F making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm T400 grades vs the WB50F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix T400 and Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm T400 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Samsung WB50F
| Fujifilm T400 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Fujifilm T400
| WB50F | Fujifilm T400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | January 2012 | More modern by 24 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Samsung WB50F
| Fujifilm T400 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm T400 comes with outside dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB50F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm T400 compared to the WB50F.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm T400 and WB50F is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The image here should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm T400 and WB50F.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same resolution and you should expect comparable quality of photos however you really should consider the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm T400 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Samsung WB50F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) | 207 gr (0.46 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC / SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $150 | $180 |