Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB750
93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Fujifilm T400 versus Samsung WB750, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and WB750 (13MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm T400 was revealed 5 months later than the WB750 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm T400 matches up versus the WB750 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix T400 & Samsung WB750. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm T400 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Samsung WB750
| Fujifilm T400 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Fujifilm T400
| WB750 | Fujifilm T400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Samsung WB750
| Fujifilm T400 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 | September 2011 | Similar age | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm T400 comes with physical dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm T400 versus Samsung WB750 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm T400 vs the WB750.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm T400 and WB750 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm T400 and WB750.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Fujifilm T400 to deliver more detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Samsung WB750 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.50 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $150 | $339 |