Fujifilm T500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37


85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Fujifilm T500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F) lens
- 136g - 99 x 57 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012

Fujifilm T500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Fujifilm T500 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm T500 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the Fujifilm T500 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor sizing.

The Fujifilm T500 was revealed within a month of the XZ-2 iHS and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm T500 scores versus the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm T500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix T500 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm T500 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T500 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm T500 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Fujifilm T500
XZ-2 iHS | Fujifilm T500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm T500 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm T500 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | December 2012 | Similar age |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Fujifilm T500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm T500 has got outer measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm T500 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm T500 and the XZ-2 iHS.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm T500 and XZ-2 iHS is 95 and 85 respectively.

Fujifilm T500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The visual here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm T500 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm T500 using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Fujifilm T500 will resolve more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.

Fujifilm T500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm T500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix T500 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix T500 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $0 | $450 |