Clicky

Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M320

Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
46
Overall
43
Fujifilm FinePix XP120 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Fujifilm XP120
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2017
  • Successor is Fujifilm XP130
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M320 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Fujifilm XP120 and Kodak M320, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP120 (16MP) and M320 (9MP) and the Fujifilm XP120 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

The Fujifilm XP120 was revealed 8 years later than the M320 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm XP120 matches up vs the M320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP120 over the Kodak M320

 Fujifilm XP120 M320 
RevealedJanuary 2017January 2009Fresher by 98 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Fujifilm XP120

 M320 Fujifilm XP120 

Common features in the Fujifilm XP120 and Kodak M320

 Fujifilm XP120 M320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP120 enjoys exterior measurements of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has specifications of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm XP120 and Kodak M320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XP120 and the M320.

Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP120 and M320 is 91 and 95 respectively.

Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing specifications. The photograph here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP120 and M320.

To sum up, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XP120 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm XP120 will render greater detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP120 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.

Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XP120 as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Portrait photography camera
42
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes face detect focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
19
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
MP count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XP120 Street photography highlights
Kodak M320 Street photography highlights
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
47
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than competitors (155g)
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XP120 Sports photography factors
Kodak M320 Sports photography factors
46
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
weather proofing
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (210 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XP120 Travel photography highlights
Kodak M320 Travel photography highlights
67
weather proofing
megapixel count good (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
terrible battery pack (210 shots)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
50
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors (155g)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm XP120
Landscape photography with Kodak M320
50
has manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
terrible battery pack (210 CIPA)
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse function
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP120 Vlogging information
Kodak M320 Vlogging information
33
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
missing microphone port
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone port
more heavy than competitors (155g)
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP120 and Kodak M320
 Fujifilm FinePix XP120Kodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Kodak
Model type Fujifilm FinePix XP120 Kodak EasyShare M320
Type Waterproof Ultracompact
Introduced 2017-01-05 2009-01-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 9 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3472 x 2604
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 6400 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focusing range 9cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 6.3
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1400s
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.40 m (at Auto ISO) 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 203 gr (0.45 lb) 155 gr (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID - KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, group shot) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $229 $39