Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M340
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
96 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Launched January 2017
- Newer Model is Fujifilm XP130
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Released January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M340 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M340, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP120 (16MP) and M340 (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm XP120 was manufactured 8 years after the M340 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm XP120 grades against the M340 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M340 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP120 & Kodak EasyShare M340. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP120 Gallery & Kodak M340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP120 over the Kodak M340
| Fujifilm XP120 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2017 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 98 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Fujifilm XP120
| M340 | Fujifilm XP120 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP120 and Kodak M340
| Fujifilm XP120 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP120 provides physical measurements of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Kodak M340 has proportions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M340 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XP120 compared to the M340.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP120 and M340 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The picture here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP120 and M340.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Fujifilm XP120 to show greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XP120 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M340 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Kodak EasyShare M340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Kodak EasyShare M340 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2017-01-05 | 2009-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2748 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.1-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 9cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 203 grams (0.45 lb) | 115 grams (0.25 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, group shot) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $229 | $130 |