Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M341
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M341 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Released January 2017
- Refreshed by Fujifilm XP130
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Launched July 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M341 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Fujifilm XP120 and Kodak M341, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP120 (16MP) and M341 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm XP120 was announced 7 years later than the M341 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm XP120 scores against the M341 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M341 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP120 and Kodak EasyShare M341. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm XP120 Gallery and Kodak M341 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP120 over the Kodak M341
| Fujifilm XP120 | M341 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2017 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 91 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Fujifilm XP120
| M341 | Fujifilm XP120 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP120 and Kodak M341
| Fujifilm XP120 | M341 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M341 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XP120 features outer measurements of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak M341 has measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm XP120 and Kodak M341 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XP120 vs the M341.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP120 and M341 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M341 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing specs. The visual below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP120 and M341.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Fujifilm XP120 to provide greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XP120 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M341 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M341 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Kodak EasyShare M341 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Kodak EasyShare M341 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2017-01-05 | 2009-07-29 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.0-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 9cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 203g (0.45 lb) | 135g (0.30 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, group shot) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $229 | $130 |