Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M381
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M381 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Refreshed by Fujifilm XP130
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced July 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M381 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Fujifilm XP120 versus Kodak M381, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP120 (16MP) and M381 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm XP120 was revealed 7 years after the M381 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm XP120 grades versus the M381 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M381 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP120 & Kodak EasyShare M381. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP120 Gallery & Kodak M381 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP120 over the Kodak M381
| Fujifilm XP120 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2017 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 91 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Fujifilm XP120
| M381 | Fujifilm XP120 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP120 and Kodak M381
| Fujifilm XP120 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M381 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP120 has external dimensions of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak M381 has proportions of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XP120 versus Kodak M381 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XP120 versus the M381.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP120 and M381 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M381 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The pic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP120 and M381.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Fujifilm XP120 to show extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XP120 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M381 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M381 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Kodak EasyShare M381 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Kodak EasyShare M381 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2017-01-05 | 2009-07-29 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.0-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 9cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 203 gr (0.45 lb) | 153 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, group shot) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $229 | $170 |