Fujifilm XP120 vs Samsung SL620
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Fujifilm XP120 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Later Model is Fujifilm XP130
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is PL65
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP120 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Fujifilm XP120 versus Samsung SL620, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP120 (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm XP120 was announced 7 years later than the SL620 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm XP120 scores vs the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP120 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP120 and Samsung SL620. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP120 Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP120 over the Samsung SL620
| Fujifilm XP120 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2017 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 96 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Fujifilm XP120
| SL620 | Fujifilm XP120 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP120 and Samsung SL620
| Fujifilm XP120 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP120 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP120 enjoys physical dimensions of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") having a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm XP120 versus Samsung SL620 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm XP120 vs the SL620.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP120 and SL620 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XP120 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The graphic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP120 and SL620.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Fujifilm XP120 to provide more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP120 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP120 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm XP120 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called as | - | PL65 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2017-01-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 9cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 203 gr (0.45 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, group shot) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $229 | $200 |