Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M320
91 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 207g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Launched January 2018
- Replaced the Fujifilm XP120
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M320 Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M320, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP130 (16MP) and M320 (9MP) and the Fujifilm XP130 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") use totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm XP130 was manufactured 9 years after the M320 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm XP130 scores versus the M320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP130 & Kodak EasyShare M320. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP130 Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP130 over the Kodak M320
| Fujifilm XP130 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2018 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 111 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Fujifilm XP130
| M320 | Fujifilm XP130 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP130 and Kodak M320
| Fujifilm XP130 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP130 provides exterior dimensions of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XP130 and the M320.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP130 and M320 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through specifications. The picture here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP130 and M320.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XP130 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Fujifilm XP130 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP130 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP130 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP130 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2018-01-24 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 9cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | YesUSB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 207 gr (0.46 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, group shot) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $171 | $39 |