Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M341
91 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M341 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 207g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Launched January 2018
- Succeeded the Fujifilm XP120
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Released July 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M341 Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Fujifilm XP130 versus Kodak M341, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP130 (16MP) and M341 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm XP130 was launched 8 years after the M341 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm XP130 grades vs the M341 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M341 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP130 & Kodak EasyShare M341. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP130 Gallery & Kodak M341 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP130 over the Kodak M341
| Fujifilm XP130 | M341 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2018 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 104 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Fujifilm XP130
| M341 | Fujifilm XP130 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP130 and Kodak M341
| Fujifilm XP130 | M341 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M341 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP130 enjoys physical dimensions of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Kodak M341 has dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XP130 versus Kodak M341 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XP130 against the M341.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP130 and M341 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M341 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing specs. The picture below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP130 and M341.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Fujifilm XP130 to produce extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XP130 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M341 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M341 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP130 | Kodak EasyShare M341 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP130 | Kodak EasyShare M341 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2018-01-24 | 2009-07-29 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.0-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 9cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | YesUSB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 207g (0.46 pounds) | 135g (0.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, group shot) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $171 | $130 |